Bottom Feeders
I have stated plenty of times, that I'm not a driver, so any comments that I make should be taken with a grain of salt. However, sometimes, I just can't help but continue to scratch my head--particularly when it comes to "Bottom Feeders."You know, drivers who, for whatever reason, fail to try the outside groove and instead will spend lap after lap--ramming another driver in the ass-end, trying to loosen them up to get under them. Or they'll dive-bomb into a turn about a half-groove onto the apron, which totally messes up their exit out of the turn and they end up body-slamming the car they're trying to pass in the center. Sometimes those are epic fails and both drivers end up getting wrecked.
My point here is this: If everyone prefers that lower groove, wouldn't it stand to reason for a driver and team to set their car up for the outside groove? Why not just roll around the outside of them and complete the pass coming off of the turns and shooting down the straightaways? Maybe I'm over-simplifying things?
But at La Crosse Speedway, the first two cautions of a feature bring out the "laning cone," and if you have a rocket ship that can navigate the outside groove--I would think setting your car up for that outside groove would come in pretty dang handy?
Don't fear the outside groove. It can make you look like a hero, instead of a zero who lacks the intestinal fortitude to do anything but whack a guy in the back end. Or worse yet, be the guy who can't seem to stay on the racing surface and has his ass in the grass trying to pass on the bottom.
Common sense says to go where others are not. Or was it Confucius who said that?